<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The invisibility of design &#8211; Ideal design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mokokoma.co.za/the-invisibility-of-design-ideal-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/the-invisibility-of-design-ideal-design/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mokokoma Mokhonoana</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/the-invisibility-of-design-ideal-design/#comment-5029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mokokoma Mokhonoana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=4350#comment-5029</guid>
		<description>Lebogang Nkoane,

I agree, I should have added &quot;interactive&quot; before &quot;design.&quot; I actually had a part were I spoke about &quot;design&quot; in the context of website development (and user-interface), I mentioned how interactive design primarily serves as a means to present content, rather than a communicative tool (read: part of a message) as in most cases with static (read: print) design.

I must have left it out, unintentionally, when I transferred the writing from TextEdit into wordpress.

Thanks for sharing your points of view, the value that they&#039;ve added to the writing is appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lebogang Nkoane,<br />
<br />
I agree, I should have added &#8220;interactive&#8221; before &#8220;design.&#8221; I actually had a part were I spoke about &#8220;design&#8221; in the context of website development (and user-interface), I mentioned how interactive design primarily serves as a means to present content, rather than a communicative tool (read: part of a message) as in most cases with static (read: print) design.<br />
<br />
I must have left it out, unintentionally, when I transferred the writing from TextEdit into wordpress.<br />
<br />
Thanks for sharing your points of view, the value that they&#8217;ve added to the writing is appreciated.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lebogang nkoane</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/the-invisibility-of-design-ideal-design/#comment-5028</link>
		<dc:creator>lebogang nkoane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=4350#comment-5028</guid>
		<description>Hmmm,, well argued.

Albeit for the &quot;the design carries the message.&quot; end of the statement.

I&#039;d say, add … &quot;interactive&quot; before the word &quot;design&quot; then it&#039;s whole other ball game.

Of which I believe would then change that statement to: “The design carries the message AND is the message.”

I am too sleep to argue that now — I just had lunch.

I&#039;ll comeback to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hmmm,, well argued.<br />
<br />
Albeit for the &#8220;the design carries the message.&#8221; end of the statement.<br />
<br />
I&#8217;d say, add … &#8220;interactive&#8221; before the word &#8220;design&#8221; then it&#8217;s whole other ball game.<br />
<br />
Of which I believe would then change that statement to: “The design carries the message AND is the message.”<br />
<br />
I am too sleep to argue that now — I just had lunch.<br />
<br />
I&#8217;ll comeback to it.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

