<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eAdvertising: pay per click or per exposure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-4901</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-4901</guid>
		<description>Pay per click makes sense when ads are published on websites where the advertiser has no idea what kind of traffic the website has (as in the case of adsense). One of the sites I run has peculiarly low traffic despite a high alexa ranking and really decent page rank. 

If advertisers were being paid per impression, then they would be paying money for nothing essentially since the alexa and PR metrics would lead them to believe that I have higher traffic. 

Once a site can prove really high traffic, the site will naturally have advertisers clamouring to advertise on a fixed price basis, as they will know that it is worth their while eg the advertising on 2oceansvibe.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pay per click makes sense when ads are published on websites where the advertiser has no idea what kind of traffic the website has (as in the case of adsense). One of the sites I run has peculiarly low traffic despite a high alexa ranking and really decent page rank. <br />
<br />
If advertisers were being paid per impression, then they would be paying money for nothing essentially since the alexa and PR metrics would lead them to believe that I have higher traffic. <br />
<br />
Once a site can prove really high traffic, the site will naturally have advertisers clamouring to advertise on a fixed price basis, as they will know that it is worth their while eg the advertising on 2oceansvibe.com.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mokokoma Mokhonoana</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mokokoma Mokhonoana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Sean Lloyd,

I hear you, but what makes publishers &#039;special&#039; is their readership - which is a market targeted by some potential advertiser out there.

While creating your own website to advertise your company on sounds like a money saving venture, it doesn&#039;t necessarily guarantee that you&#039;ll attract your company&#039;s targeted market or better audience than those of a certain publisher.

Thanks for the link to College humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sean Lloyd,<br />
<br />
I hear you, but what makes publishers &#8216;special&#8217; is their readership &#8211; which is a market targeted by some potential advertiser out there.<br />
<br />
While creating your own website to advertise your company on sounds like a money saving venture, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily guarantee that you&#8217;ll attract your company&#8217;s targeted market or better audience than those of a certain publisher.<br />
<br />
Thanks for the link to College humor.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mokokoma Mokhonoana</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mokokoma Mokhonoana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Yasser,

Advertisers should be charged for their exposure which is meant to lead to action (sales) not for the visitor&#039;s action alone.

As a publisher I might not have led my visitor to click on an advertisers advert, reason being they don&#039;t find the services / products advertised appealing but I exposed the advertiser&#039;s brand - which is an investment to the advertiser - I think it&#039;s only fair for the advertiser to also acknowledge that - financially.

The publisher is meant to charge what the ad space is worth not what the advertiser&#039;s budget would afford.

How much to charge obviously is dependent on a lot of factors from the publisher&#039;s side, the most determining one being the exposure measured in size readership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yasser,<br />
<br />
Advertisers should be charged for their exposure which is meant to lead to action (sales) not for the visitor&#8217;s action alone.<br />
<br />
As a publisher I might not have led my visitor to click on an advertisers advert, reason being they don&#8217;t find the services / products advertised appealing but I exposed the advertiser&#8217;s brand &#8211; which is an investment to the advertiser &#8211; I think it&#8217;s only fair for the advertiser to also acknowledge that &#8211; financially.<br />
<br />
The publisher is meant to charge what the ad space is worth not what the advertiser&#8217;s budget would afford.<br />
<br />
How much to charge obviously is dependent on a lot of factors from the publisher&#8217;s side, the most determining one being the exposure measured in size readership.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Personally I think pay per click and referral will always be a part of internet advertising. However, if you really want to make loads of cash from internet advertising it&#039;s probably best you create a company/brand website that advertisers want to pay to be on. College Humour comes to mind, with advertisers paying up to $60000 a month to feature on the website.

Scroll down on the following link and look for the College Humour write up, very interesting:

http://www.thecoolhunter.net/profiles/

Alternatively what people do nowadays is create blogs/websites that are funny and interesting and they advertise their own companies on their own website.

This is the best way of maximising profits as you are essentially advertising your businesses for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Personally I think pay per click and referral will always be a part of internet advertising. However, if you really want to make loads of cash from internet advertising it&#8217;s probably best you create a company/brand website that advertisers want to pay to be on. College Humour comes to mind, with advertisers paying up to $60000 a month to feature on the website.<br />
<br />
Scroll down on the following link and look for the College Humour write up, very interesting:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thecoolhunter.net/profiles/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thecoolhunter.net/profiles/</a><br />
<br />
Alternatively what people do nowadays is create blogs/websites that are funny and interesting and they advertise their own companies on their own website.<br />
<br />
This is the best way of maximising profits as you are essentially advertising your businesses for free.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasser</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-144</guid>
		<description>pay per exposure, but how much would advertisers pay then?
or would they have the finance to pay all the websites that they advertise to world wide? 
suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[pay per exposure, but how much would advertisers pay then?<br />
or would they have the finance to pay all the websites that they advertise to world wide? <br />
suggestions?]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasser</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-143</guid>
		<description>very intersting Mokokoma, very thought provoking.
web advertising needs a thorough review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[very intersting Mokokoma, very thought provoking.<br />
web advertising needs a thorough review.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mokokoma Mokhonoana</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Mokokoma Mokhonoana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 09:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Sean Lloyd,

One other important point you added, is the fact that after clicking on the advertiser&#039;s advert once, the visitor goes directly (not through clicking the ad on the publisher&#039;s site) to the advertiser&#039;s site  from the second visit onwards.

Which means the publisher will not be part of any future transactions, therefore the publisher will not be remunerated.

Thanks for sharing your views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sean Lloyd,<br />
<br />
One other important point you added, is the fact that after clicking on the advertiser&#8217;s advert once, the visitor goes directly (not through clicking the ad on the publisher&#8217;s site) to the advertiser&#8217;s site  from the second visit onwards.<br />
<br />
Which means the publisher will not be part of any future transactions, therefore the publisher will not be remunerated.<br />
<br />
Thanks for sharing your views.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 06:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-141</guid>
		<description>This is a brilliant thought, I wanted to write something similar a while back but never got around to it.

I believe in a fixed monthly payment, as pay per click does benefit the advertiser rather than the publisher.

Another thing I believe to be unfair is referral links, where, say someone clicks on an ad on my website, gets referred to my advertisers site, and then buys something there, then I get a percentage of what is bought.

kalahari.net do this, and loads of other sites. The problem is, a person needs to click your referral link to ensure that you make the money. What often happens in these cases, is people click the ad, and don&#039;t buy a product straight away.

But they do remember the advert, and later on when they are ready to buy a product, they will usually go directly to the website selling the product, and the publisher makes no money, even though they have increased exposure for a brand.

And once people have used a referral on your site once, they will normally go directly to your advertisers site in the future, instead of clicking through your site.

So it definitely works in an advertisers favour and not in the publishers favour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a brilliant thought, I wanted to write something similar a while back but never got around to it.<br />
<br />
I believe in a fixed monthly payment, as pay per click does benefit the advertiser rather than the publisher.<br />
<br />
Another thing I believe to be unfair is referral links, where, say someone clicks on an ad on my website, gets referred to my advertisers site, and then buys something there, then I get a percentage of what is bought.<br />
<br />
kalahari.net do this, and loads of other sites. The problem is, a person needs to click your referral link to ensure that you make the money. What often happens in these cases, is people click the ad, and don&#8217;t buy a product straight away.<br />
<br />
But they do remember the advert, and later on when they are ready to buy a product, they will usually go directly to the website selling the product, and the publisher makes no money, even though they have increased exposure for a brand.<br />
<br />
And once people have used a referral on your site once, they will normally go directly to your advertisers site in the future, instead of clicking through your site.<br />
<br />
So it definitely works in an advertisers favour and not in the publishers favour.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South African</title>
		<link>http://mokokoma.co.za/eadvertising-pay-per-click-or-per-exposure/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>South African</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 05:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mokokoma.co.za/?p=73#comment-140</guid>
		<description>In a fair world the amount paid to the publisher should average out to more or less the same for pay per click or pay per exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[In a fair world the amount paid to the publisher should average out to more or less the same for pay per click or pay per exposure.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
